<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 64 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty provisions applicable are those in force on the date the return was filed. The court concluded that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties on February 22, 1972, due to an amendment that curtailed his jurisdiction. Therefore, the penalties imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner were deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 64 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty provisions applicable are those in force on the date the return was filed. The court concluded that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties on February 22, 1972, due to an amendment that curtailed his jurisdiction. Therefore, the penalties imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner were deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>