https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287499 A complaint for an offence punishable under the Industrial Disputes Act was subject to the limitation period under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court held that section 34(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act requires only that the complaint be made by or under the authority of the appropriate Government; it does not require prior consent or sanction for prosecution. As a result, the time taken to obtain authorisation could not be excluded under section 470(3) of the Code, because that provision applies only where sanction or consent is legally required. The complaint was therefore barred by limitation and the process order was liable to be quashed. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:42:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287499 A complaint for an offence punishable under the Industrial Disputes Act was subject to the limitation period under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court held that section 34(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act requires only that the complaint be made by or under the authority of the appropriate Government; it does not require prior consent or sanction for prosecution. As a result, the time taken to obtain authorisation could not be excluded under section 470(3) of the Code, because that provision applies only where sanction or consent is legally required. The complaint was therefore barred by limitation and the process order was liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287499