<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 457 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394550</link>
    <description>A confiscation order in Form GST MOV-11 was treated as unsustainable where the noticee was directed to appear on the same date on which the order was passed, leaving no real opportunity of hearing before confiscation proceedings under the GST law. The denial of reasonable hearing vitiated the order, so it was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after proper notice and hearing. The merits of the dispute were left open for reconsideration by the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 457 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394550</link>
      <description>A confiscation order in Form GST MOV-11 was treated as unsustainable where the noticee was directed to appear on the same date on which the order was passed, leaving no real opportunity of hearing before confiscation proceedings under the GST law. The denial of reasonable hearing vitiated the order, so it was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after proper notice and hearing. The merits of the dispute were left open for reconsideration by the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>