<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 456 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394549</link>
    <description>The High Court directed to keep the demand in abeyance until the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is disposed of. The Court emphasized the questionable basis of the assessment and the lack of cross-examination of a crucial third party&#039;s statement. It stressed the importance of considering the pending appeal and ensuring justice by keeping the demand on hold. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was ordered to decide the appeal within four months, with the notice of demand to be kept in abeyance until then. The Court&#039;s observations were limited to the stay application and not final findings on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 456 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394549</link>
      <description>The High Court directed to keep the demand in abeyance until the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is disposed of. The Court emphasized the questionable basis of the assessment and the lack of cross-examination of a crucial third party&#039;s statement. It stressed the importance of considering the pending appeal and ensuring justice by keeping the demand on hold. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was ordered to decide the appeal within four months, with the notice of demand to be kept in abeyance until then. The Court&#039;s observations were limited to the stay application and not final findings on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>