https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394547 The High Court set aside the order passed by the Income Tax Officer holding the petitioner liable for tax arrears of the firm, including for a period after the petitioner's retirement. The Court found no pending demand against the firm and clarified that the petitioner, who had retired before the subsequent assessment year, was not liable for those tax arrears. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed, rectifying the anomaly in the demand raised against the petitioner post-retirement. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394547 The High Court set aside the order passed by the Income Tax Officer holding the petitioner liable for tax arrears of the firm, including for a period after the petitioner's retirement. The Court found no pending demand against the firm and clarified that the petitioner, who had retired before the subsequent assessment year, was not liable for those tax arrears. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed, rectifying the anomaly in the demand raised against the petitioner post-retirement. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394547