<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Wins Refund of Special Additional Duty Despite Goods Description Mismatch Under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53000</link>
    <description>Refund of SAD - mis-match of description of the goods - The SAD is paid on importation of the goods to safe guard the revenue of the state i.e. VAT/CST. As the same has been paid by the appellant, therefore, the appellant is entitled to claim the refund of SAD paid by them at the time of importation of the goods in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dt. 14.09.2007. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:51:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Wins Refund of Special Additional Duty Despite Goods Description Mismatch Under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53000</link>
      <description>Refund of SAD - mis-match of description of the goods - The SAD is paid on importation of the goods to safe guard the revenue of the state i.e. VAT/CST. As the same has been paid by the appellant, therefore, the appellant is entitled to claim the refund of SAD paid by them at the time of importation of the goods in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dt. 14.09.2007. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:51:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>