https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287493 Limitation for a suit challenging dismissal of a public servant began only after the statutory service-rule remedy, including review, was finally exhausted, and the section 80 CPC notice period was also to be counted; the suit was therefore within time. Non-supply of the Vigilance Commission Report, which formed part of the material relied on in the disciplinary process, denied an effective hearing and breached audi alteram partem, so the dismissal order was vitiated and liable to be set aside. The appeal succeeded, and the setting aside of dismissal carried the related monetary and service benefits. en-us Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:36:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287493 Limitation for a suit challenging dismissal of a public servant began only after the statutory service-rule remedy, including review, was finally exhausted, and the section 80 CPC notice period was also to be counted; the suit was therefore within time. Non-supply of the Vigilance Commission Report, which formed part of the material relied on in the disciplinary process, denied an effective hearing and breached audi alteram partem, so the dismissal order was vitiated and liable to be set aside. The appeal succeeded, and the setting aside of dismissal carried the related monetary and service benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287493