<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 445 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394538</link>
    <description>Refund claims for unutilised credit before revenue authorities must comply with the statutory limitation period prescribed in the refund provisions. The general law of limitation does not extend that period, and a claim cannot be revived merely on the basis that tax was paid under a mistake of law once the statutory time limit has expired. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 445 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394538</link>
      <description>Refund claims for unutilised credit before revenue authorities must comply with the statutory limitation period prescribed in the refund provisions. The general law of limitation does not extend that period, and a claim cannot be revived merely on the basis that tax was paid under a mistake of law once the statutory time limit has expired. The refund claim was therefore time-barred and was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>