https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394537 The Tribunal set aside the demand for the remaining amount of Rs. 10,38,860, ruling in favor of the appellant who correctly reversed Rs. 24,67,690 based on an agreement for subsidized food charges. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the demand amount due to the adjudicating authority's failure to properly verify figures as per the remand order. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, with no penalty imposed, based on the correct interpretation of the remand order and evidence presented regarding Cenvat credit reversal for Outdoor Catering Service. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:24:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394537 The Tribunal set aside the demand for the remaining amount of Rs. 10,38,860, ruling in favor of the appellant who correctly reversed Rs. 24,67,690 based on an agreement for subsidized food charges. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the demand amount due to the adjudicating authority's failure to properly verify figures as per the remand order. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, with no penalty imposed, based on the correct interpretation of the remand order and evidence presented regarding Cenvat credit reversal for Outdoor Catering Service. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394537