<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1891 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287489</link>
    <description>Appeals were admitted on substantial questions of law challenging jurisdiction to levy cost recovery charges, penalties, and orders concerning approval as custodian. Notice was dispensed with because the respondent was already represented, the matters were fixed for final hearing, and interim protection against coercive action was granted pending disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1891 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287489</link>
      <description>Appeals were admitted on substantial questions of law challenging jurisdiction to levy cost recovery charges, penalties, and orders concerning approval as custodian. Notice was dispensed with because the respondent was already represented, the matters were fixed for final hearing, and interim protection against coercive action was granted pending disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>