https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287476 Article 166 was treated as directory as to form, so a Government decision on interview marks was not invalid merely because the communication lacked ideal authentication, where the decision's existence was otherwise established. A State controlling its own colleges could prescribe reasonable admission machinery and criteria, including interviews for qualified candidates, without violating the University's minimum requirements or Article 14 on the material before the Court. Under Article 15(4), caste was held to be only a relevant factor in identifying socially and educationally backward classes, not a compulsory or dominant test, so omission of caste as a necessary criterion did not invalidate the classification. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287476 Article 166 was treated as directory as to form, so a Government decision on interview marks was not invalid merely because the communication lacked ideal authentication, where the decision's existence was otherwise established. A State controlling its own colleges could prescribe reasonable admission machinery and criteria, including interviews for qualified candidates, without violating the University's minimum requirements or Article 14 on the material before the Court. Under Article 15(4), caste was held to be only a relevant factor in identifying socially and educationally backward classes, not a compulsory or dominant test, so omission of caste as a necessary criterion did not invalidate the classification. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287476