<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 432 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. For loans from individuals, the Tribunal accepted documentation for a Rs. 1 lakh loan and a Rs. 3 lakh loan from a non-resident, removing a Rs. 4 lakh addition. Regarding cash deposits, the Tribunal found the deposits were business income and loans from villagers for share trading, supported by identity proofs. The Tribunal held that the AO should have conducted further verification as necessary documentation was provided, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 432 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. For loans from individuals, the Tribunal accepted documentation for a Rs. 1 lakh loan and a Rs. 3 lakh loan from a non-resident, removing a Rs. 4 lakh addition. Regarding cash deposits, the Tribunal found the deposits were business income and loans from villagers for share trading, supported by identity proofs. The Tribunal held that the AO should have conducted further verification as necessary documentation was provided, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>