<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22029</link>
    <description>The court held that the excess income-tax paid by the assessee-company over the liability taken over from the vendor-firm constitutes capital expenditure and is not deductible as a revenue expense. The income-tax liability of the vendor-firm borne by the assessee-company was deemed a non-trading liability and also not allowed as a revenue deduction. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22029</link>
      <description>The court held that the excess income-tax paid by the assessee-company over the liability taken over from the vendor-firm constitutes capital expenditure and is not deductible as a revenue expense. The income-tax liability of the vendor-firm borne by the assessee-company was deemed a non-trading liability and also not allowed as a revenue deduction. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>