<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the incorporation of the Respondent No. 1 Company invalid due to fraud, holding the second Respondent responsible for all liabilities. The Petitioner&#039;s additional reliefs were dismissed, but she was given the freedom to pursue remedies under the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal did not order costs and refrained from recommending criminal action against the second and third Respondents due to ongoing matrimonial disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the incorporation of the Respondent No. 1 Company invalid due to fraud, holding the second Respondent responsible for all liabilities. The Petitioner&#039;s additional reliefs were dismissed, but she was given the freedom to pursue remedies under the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal did not order costs and refrained from recommending criminal action against the second and third Respondents due to ongoing matrimonial disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>