https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287465 A family arrangement embodied in a compromise deed can validly impose a partial restraint on alienation, including a restriction against transfers to strangers while permitting intra-family transfers. Such a covenant was treated as consistent with justice, equity and good conscience, and alienations made in breach of it did not prevail against the respondent or confer title on the transferees. The text also notes that, after Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, partial restraints in inter vivos transfers were not regarded as void, and there was no sufficient basis to treat the arrangement as unlawful even before the Act. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:25:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287465 A family arrangement embodied in a compromise deed can validly impose a partial restraint on alienation, including a restriction against transfers to strangers while permitting intra-family transfers. Such a covenant was treated as consistent with justice, equity and good conscience, and alienations made in breach of it did not prevail against the respondent or confer title on the transferees. The text also notes that, after Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, partial restraints in inter vivos transfers were not regarded as void, and there was no sufficient basis to treat the arrangement as unlawful even before the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287465