<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 414 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on the disputed supplementary invoices issued by SECL and WCL. The decision emphasized the absence of fraud or suppression, aligning with precedents permitting such credits. The impugned order-in-appeal was overturned, and the appeals were granted in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 414 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on the disputed supplementary invoices issued by SECL and WCL. The decision emphasized the absence of fraud or suppression, aligning with precedents permitting such credits. The impugned order-in-appeal was overturned, and the appeals were granted in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>