https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287463 A person sanctioned under Section 28 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 is not automatically treated as a Part II licensee for Section 57 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, but tariff conditions imposed in the sanction order may still bind the sanction-holder and incorporate Schedule VI by their own terms. The Court further treated later State Government approval as capable of validating an earlier tariff revision from the effective date, and held that the sixty days' notice requirement in Schedule VI was directory on the facts because no consumer prejudice was shown and the revised tariff was not beyond the reasonable return ceiling. The revised electricity rates were therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287463 A person sanctioned under Section 28 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 is not automatically treated as a Part II licensee for Section 57 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, but tariff conditions imposed in the sanction order may still bind the sanction-holder and incorporate Schedule VI by their own terms. The Court further treated later State Government approval as capable of validating an earlier tariff revision from the effective date, and held that the sixty days' notice requirement in Schedule VI was directory on the facts because no consumer prejudice was shown and the revised tariff was not beyond the reasonable return ceiling. The revised electricity rates were therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287463