<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 659 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287462</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the single Judge, ruling in favor of the petitioner in an Original Petition seeking to quash demands for additional cost recovery charges due to Customs personnel pay revision. The court found that the petitioner was not obligated to pay amounts for pay revision as the Bond did not contain a clause obliging such payments, limiting liability to Rs. 20 lakhs. The Writ Appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, with the High Court seeing no reason to interfere with the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 659 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287462</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the single Judge, ruling in favor of the petitioner in an Original Petition seeking to quash demands for additional cost recovery charges due to Customs personnel pay revision. The court found that the petitioner was not obligated to pay amounts for pay revision as the Bond did not contain a clause obliging such payments, limiting liability to Rs. 20 lakhs. The Writ Appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, with the High Court seeing no reason to interfere with the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>