https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287461 A partition decree is not final in law merely because a printed decree form has been signed if the material particulars remain blank and the substantive steps required for partition have not been completed. Where partition has not in fact been effected, the preliminary decree continues to operate. An application seeking appointment of a commissioner to carry out partition is not an ordinary discretionary request but a reminder to the court to perform a ministerial duty already imposed by the decree, and it therefore does not fall within Article 181 of the Limitation Schedule. On that reasoning, the application was not time-barred. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:44:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287461 A partition decree is not final in law merely because a printed decree form has been signed if the material particulars remain blank and the substantive steps required for partition have not been completed. Where partition has not in fact been effected, the preliminary decree continues to operate. An application seeking appointment of a commissioner to carry out partition is not an ordinary discretionary request but a reminder to the court to perform a ministerial duty already imposed by the decree, and it therefore does not fall within Article 181 of the Limitation Schedule. On that reasoning, the application was not time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287461