<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1291 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287457</link>
    <description>Land transferred to a municipal corporation was treated as compulsorily acquired where statutory acquisition proceedings had been initiated after the land was reserved for a sewage treatment plant. Execution of sale deeds after negotiation on compensation did not alter the compulsory character of the acquisition, and a negotiated settlement on compensation was not enough to convert the transaction into a voluntary sale for section 10(37) purposes. The fact that the assessee did not personally carry out agricultural operations did not defeat exemption where the governing interpretation of section 10(37) was otherwise satisfied. The capital gain claim was accepted and the disallowance by the lower authorities was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1291 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287457</link>
      <description>Land transferred to a municipal corporation was treated as compulsorily acquired where statutory acquisition proceedings had been initiated after the land was reserved for a sewage treatment plant. Execution of sale deeds after negotiation on compensation did not alter the compulsory character of the acquisition, and a negotiated settlement on compensation was not enough to convert the transaction into a voluntary sale for section 10(37) purposes. The fact that the assessee did not personally carry out agricultural operations did not defeat exemption where the governing interpretation of section 10(37) was otherwise satisfied. The capital gain claim was accepted and the disallowance by the lower authorities was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>