<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1954 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, permitting them to avail Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by SECL. The decision was made based on the absence of fraud and the recurring nature of the issue, in line with prior judgments involving SECL and other entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1954 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, permitting them to avail Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by SECL. The decision was made based on the absence of fraud and the recurring nature of the issue, in line with prior judgments involving SECL and other entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>