<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1890 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the Statutory Auditors from a Company Petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Auditors were found not to be necessary parties as the allegations were against the Company, Board of Directors, and Shareholders. Since their conduct was already under investigation, involving them in the proceedings could lead to conflicting decisions. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1890 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the Statutory Auditors from a Company Petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Auditors were found not to be necessary parties as the allegations were against the Company, Board of Directors, and Shareholders. Since their conduct was already under investigation, involving them in the proceedings could lead to conflicting decisions. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>