https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287440 Interference with an acquittal is permissible where the trial court's view is unreasonable, rests on misappreciation of evidence, or ignores material circumstances; two possible views do not bar reversal. A prosecutrix's testimony, if found reliable, can by itself sustain a conviction for attempt to commit rape, and must be read as a whole rather than by isolating an isolated answer from cross-examination. Here, the prosecutrix's account of forcible sexual assault was found truthful, medical evidence did not discredit it, and surrounding circumstances such as immediate disclosure, absence from school, and forensic semen evidence corroborated her version. The conviction was sustained and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:09:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287440 Interference with an acquittal is permissible where the trial court's view is unreasonable, rests on misappreciation of evidence, or ignores material circumstances; two possible views do not bar reversal. A prosecutrix's testimony, if found reliable, can by itself sustain a conviction for attempt to commit rape, and must be read as a whole rather than by isolating an isolated answer from cross-examination. Here, the prosecutrix's account of forcible sexual assault was found truthful, medical evidence did not discredit it, and surrounding circumstances such as immediate disclosure, absence from school, and forensic semen evidence corroborated her version. The conviction was sustained and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287440