https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287438 Interference with an acquittal is justified only for compelling reasons, such as manifest legal or factual error causing miscarriage of justice. The High Court reappreciated the evidence because the Sessions Judge's finding about blood in the outer room was unsupported by the record and involved a material error. The surrounding circumstances, including blood-stained bedding, the nature and location of injuries, absence of forced entry, the deceased being found helpless in a closed room, and the accused's false theft narrative, formed a complete chain of circumstantial evidence pointing only to guilt. The conviction was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287438 Interference with an acquittal is justified only for compelling reasons, such as manifest legal or factual error causing miscarriage of justice. The High Court reappreciated the evidence because the Sessions Judge's finding about blood in the outer room was unsupported by the record and involved a material error. The surrounding circumstances, including blood-stained bedding, the nature and location of injuries, absence of forced entry, the deceased being found helpless in a closed room, and the accused's false theft narrative, formed a complete chain of circumstantial evidence pointing only to guilt. The conviction was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287438