<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22022</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s additions for deliberate inflation of cotton purchase prices, disallowed interest on borrowings diverted for non-business purposes, added to total income for alleged excess cotton consumption due to fraudulent activities, and allowed deduction of compensation payments as non-speculative transactions. The Court ruled in favor of the Department on all issues except one, directing parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22022</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s additions for deliberate inflation of cotton purchase prices, disallowed interest on borrowings diverted for non-business purposes, added to total income for alleged excess cotton consumption due to fraudulent activities, and allowed deduction of compensation payments as non-speculative transactions. The Court ruled in favor of the Department on all issues except one, directing parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>