https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287434 An appellate court in an appeal against acquittal may reappraise the evidence, but it must respect the strengthened presumption of innocence and consider the trial court's reasons before interfering. Applying that standard, the High Court found that the trial court had misread and ignored material evidence and concluded that the accused had caused the fatal injury. The Supreme Court held that this appraisal was fair and justified, found no legal infirmity or jurisdictional excess, and upheld the conviction. en-us Thu, 03 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:47:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287434 An appellate court in an appeal against acquittal may reappraise the evidence, but it must respect the strengthened presumption of innocence and consider the trial court's reasons before interfering. Applying that standard, the High Court found that the trial court had misread and ignored material evidence and concluded that the accused had caused the fatal injury. The Supreme Court held that this appraisal was fair and justified, found no legal infirmity or jurisdictional excess, and upheld the conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287434