https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287432 Injured eye-witness testimony, when supported by medical evidence and corroborating witnesses, can sustain a conviction despite minor discrepancies in the account of events and the absence of independent witnesses. In appellate review, factual interference is justified where the evidence supports reversal of acquittal. The statutory duty to supply prior investigation statements under the Code protects effective cross-examination, but breach does not automatically vitiate the trial; the accused must show prejudice or failure of justice. On the facts, no such prejudice was proved, so the conviction was maintained. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:14:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287432 Injured eye-witness testimony, when supported by medical evidence and corroborating witnesses, can sustain a conviction despite minor discrepancies in the account of events and the absence of independent witnesses. In appellate review, factual interference is justified where the evidence supports reversal of acquittal. The statutory duty to supply prior investigation statements under the Code protects effective cross-examination, but breach does not automatically vitiate the trial; the accused must show prejudice or failure of justice. On the facts, no such prejudice was proved, so the conviction was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287432