<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 405 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394498</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed primarily on the grounds of the limited scrutiny assessment being beyond the authorized scope, rendering the entire assessment void ab initio. The specific issues related to disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D and its impact on Book Profit u/s 115JB were not individually addressed due to the overarching finding of the assessment order being invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 405 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394498</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed primarily on the grounds of the limited scrutiny assessment being beyond the authorized scope, rendering the entire assessment void ab initio. The specific issues related to disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D and its impact on Book Profit u/s 115JB were not individually addressed due to the overarching finding of the assessment order being invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>