<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction regarding the specific limb of the section and did not issue a clear show cause notice. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid, and the Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:14:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to record satisfaction regarding the specific limb of the section and did not issue a clear show cause notice. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid, and the Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>