<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 383 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting Cenvat credit on capital goods used in constructing a shopping mall for renting immovable property services. Despite a procedural error in treating litter bins as capital goods, the Tribunal permitted the credit on the bins as inputs for services. The appellant successfully argued that the capital goods were directly used for providing output services, leading to the allowance of the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 383 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting Cenvat credit on capital goods used in constructing a shopping mall for renting immovable property services. Despite a procedural error in treating litter bins as capital goods, the Tribunal permitted the credit on the bins as inputs for services. The appellant successfully argued that the capital goods were directly used for providing output services, leading to the allowance of the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>