https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287426 The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals concerning the disallowance of expenses on repairs, renovations, and brokerage, the non-admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A, and the disallowance of expenses for unrecoverable loans under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO, concluding that the expenses were unverifiable, the additional evidence was inadmissible, and the claimed expenditure did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 57(iii). The appeals for the assessment years 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13 were all dismissed. en-us Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287426 The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals concerning the disallowance of expenses on repairs, renovations, and brokerage, the non-admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A, and the disallowance of expenses for unrecoverable loans under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO, concluding that the expenses were unverifiable, the additional evidence was inadmissible, and the claimed expenditure did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 57(iii). The appeals for the assessment years 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13 were all dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287426