https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394469 The Tribunal found that the discrepancy in stock identified by the Public Sector Undertaking was a normal loss due to handling, evaporation, and calculation errors. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation and ruled out clandestine removal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Addl. Commissioner. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the original order was set aside, and the appellant was granted appropriate relief as per the law. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:24:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394469 The Tribunal found that the discrepancy in stock identified by the Public Sector Undertaking was a normal loss due to handling, evaporation, and calculation errors. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation and ruled out clandestine removal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Addl. Commissioner. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the original order was set aside, and the appellant was granted appropriate relief as per the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394469