<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1269 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287425</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the reactivation of the petitioners&#039; Director Identification Numbers (DINs). The judgment emphasized the prospective application of Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, and invalidated the premature publication of the disqualification list. The court held that the deactivation of DINs due to disqualification under Section 164(2) was not legally permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1269 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287425</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the reactivation of the petitioners&#039; Director Identification Numbers (DINs). The judgment emphasized the prospective application of Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, and invalidated the premature publication of the disqualification list. The court held that the deactivation of DINs due to disqualification under Section 164(2) was not legally permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>