<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1812 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287422</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned in the civil appeal, and notice was issued after the Court perused the material and heard counsel. The order records only these procedural directions and does not state any substantive determination on the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1812 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287422</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned in the civil appeal, and notice was issued after the Court perused the material and heard counsel. The order records only these procedural directions and does not state any substantive determination on the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>