<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 360 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394453</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to reconsider the deduction u/s. 54. The delay in construction was deemed beyond the assessee&#039;s control due to legal restrictions, leading to the ITAT&#039;s decision to treat the construction as timely. The matter was remitted to the AO for further examination, emphasizing the circumstances surrounding the delay. The appeal was considered partly allowed, with the decision issued on 22nd January 2020 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:43:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 360 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394453</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to reconsider the deduction u/s. 54. The delay in construction was deemed beyond the assessee&#039;s control due to legal restrictions, leading to the ITAT&#039;s decision to treat the construction as timely. The matter was remitted to the AO for further examination, emphasizing the circumstances surrounding the delay. The appeal was considered partly allowed, with the decision issued on 22nd January 2020 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>