<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 358 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394451</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order confirming penal demurrage charges, citing lack of proper consideration and fair hearing for the petitioner. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with directions to provide the petitioner a fair opportunity to present their case within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:30:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 358 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394451</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order confirming penal demurrage charges, citing lack of proper consideration and fair hearing for the petitioner. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with directions to provide the petitioner a fair opportunity to present their case within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>