<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22006</link>
    <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act is not maintainable where the Tribunal has declined a reference by following an earlier binding High Court decision that had already answered the same questions in favour of the assessee. If the proposed questions have been conclusively settled in the assessee&#039;s own case, the Tribunal&#039;s conformity with that precedent means no referable question of law survives for consideration under section 256(2). On that basis, no reference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:46:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22006</link>
      <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act is not maintainable where the Tribunal has declined a reference by following an earlier binding High Court decision that had already answered the same questions in favour of the assessee. If the proposed questions have been conclusively settled in the assessee&#039;s own case, the Tribunal&#039;s conformity with that precedent means no referable question of law survives for consideration under section 256(2). On that basis, no reference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>