<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 274 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287400</link>
    <description>Withdrawal from prosecution requires the Public Prosecutor to apply an independent mind and seek court consent only on grounds relevant to public justice. Executive authorities may request reconsideration on legitimate public-policy considerations, but they cannot dictate the decision or substitute their own judgment. On the facts described, the Public Prosecutor examined the second enquiry, considered witness statements and other material, and arrived at an independent conclusion; the record did not show political influence or blind compliance with the District Magistrate&#039;s direction. The withdrawal was therefore upheld because the prosecutor&#039;s independence remained intact and executive involvement did not vitiate the court&#039;s consent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 274 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287400</link>
      <description>Withdrawal from prosecution requires the Public Prosecutor to apply an independent mind and seek court consent only on grounds relevant to public justice. Executive authorities may request reconsideration on legitimate public-policy considerations, but they cannot dictate the decision or substitute their own judgment. On the facts described, the Public Prosecutor examined the second enquiry, considered witness statements and other material, and arrived at an independent conclusion; the record did not show political influence or blind compliance with the District Magistrate&#039;s direction. The withdrawal was therefore upheld because the prosecutor&#039;s independence remained intact and executive involvement did not vitiate the court&#039;s consent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>