https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287398 In committal proceedings, the Court held that the timetable need not be modified merely because the accused sought more time to inspect police records, where sufficient adjournments had already been granted and the material complained of was largely irrelevant to the limited committal stage. It further noted that if the police report disclosed a Sessions offence on unsupported or fabricated facts, the accused could still seek discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Magistrate was therefore justified in refusing further delay, and the request for enlargement of time was rejected. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287398 In committal proceedings, the Court held that the timetable need not be modified merely because the accused sought more time to inspect police records, where sufficient adjournments had already been granted and the material complained of was largely irrelevant to the limited committal stage. It further noted that if the police report disclosed a Sessions offence on unsupported or fabricated facts, the accused could still seek discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Magistrate was therefore justified in refusing further delay, and the request for enlargement of time was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287398