<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cash payments made by the assessee to Amrit Banaspati Company fell within the exemption provided in clause (j) of rule 6DD, due to genuine transactions and business expediency. The decision was supported by judicial precedents emphasizing the importance of establishing the seller&#039;s identity and considering business expediency. The reference was answered in favor of the assessee, distinguishing it from a precedent with different circumstances. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:35:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cash payments made by the assessee to Amrit Banaspati Company fell within the exemption provided in clause (j) of rule 6DD, due to genuine transactions and business expediency. The decision was supported by judicial precedents emphasizing the importance of establishing the seller&#039;s identity and considering business expediency. The reference was answered in favor of the assessee, distinguishing it from a precedent with different circumstances. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>