<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394429</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the matter to be restored to the First Appellate Authority to decide the appeal afresh within six months. Both parties were to be given a reasonable opportunity, emphasizing the importance of upholding the Assessee&#039;s statutory right to appeal and ensuring fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394429</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the matter to be restored to the First Appellate Authority to decide the appeal afresh within six months. Both parties were to be given a reasonable opportunity, emphasizing the importance of upholding the Assessee&#039;s statutory right to appeal and ensuring fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>