<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1480 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding Share Application Money and Share Premium, remitting the matter for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The case was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the cross-objection also allowed for statistical purposes to maintain judicial consistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1480 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding Share Application Money and Share Premium, remitting the matter for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The case was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the cross-objection also allowed for statistical purposes to maintain judicial consistency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>