<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1601 - Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287382</link>
    <description>Registration under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act could be cancelled where the dealer failed to prove genuine purchases or actual movement of goods, and the record indicated bogus billing activity. On those facts, the Tribunal held that the cancellation authority was empowered to act where incorrect particulars or transactions suggesting evasion or defrauding of revenue were shown, and the cancellation of registration was therefore justified. Payment of tax and interest did not undo the statutory ground for cancellation, because such payment was treated as consistent with the finding that the transactions were not genuine. The appeal failed and the cancellation orders were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1601 - Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287382</link>
      <description>Registration under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act could be cancelled where the dealer failed to prove genuine purchases or actual movement of goods, and the record indicated bogus billing activity. On those facts, the Tribunal held that the cancellation authority was empowered to act where incorrect particulars or transactions suggesting evasion or defrauding of revenue were shown, and the cancellation of registration was therefore justified. Payment of tax and interest did not undo the statutory ground for cancellation, because such payment was treated as consistent with the finding that the transactions were not genuine. The appeal failed and the cancellation orders were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>