<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 148 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287378</link>
    <description>Concurrent power to tender pardon under Section 337 permits the District Magistrate to consider and grant pardon despite an earlier refusal by a First Class Magistrate. The proviso restricts First Class Magistrates but does not impose an equivalent restriction on the District Magistrate; however, judicial propriety ordinarily calls for fresh or additional facts where a lower authority considers pardon after a higher authority&#039;s refusal. An order granting pardon is made in criminal proceedings and is revisable under Section 435 for correctness, legality, propriety, and procedural regularity. Consequently, a Sessions Court may entertain revision against a District Magistrate&#039;s pardon order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 148 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287378</link>
      <description>Concurrent power to tender pardon under Section 337 permits the District Magistrate to consider and grant pardon despite an earlier refusal by a First Class Magistrate. The proviso restricts First Class Magistrates but does not impose an equivalent restriction on the District Magistrate; however, judicial propriety ordinarily calls for fresh or additional facts where a lower authority considers pardon after a higher authority&#039;s refusal. An order granting pardon is made in criminal proceedings and is revisable under Section 435 for correctness, legality, propriety, and procedural regularity. Consequently, a Sessions Court may entertain revision against a District Magistrate&#039;s pardon order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>