https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287373 The Supreme Court upheld a non-speaking award in favor of a contractor against the Government of Andhra Pradesh, dismissing challenges to its validity. The Court clarified that errors on the face of the record must be distinguished from arbitrators exceeding jurisdiction. The Court held that as the award did not exceed the arbitrator's jurisdiction, challenges based on it being a non-speaking award were dismissed. Additionally, the Court found that the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction in awarding damages for escalation of costs and expenses as no specific amount was awarded for it. The special leave petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioners to withdraw the awarded sum without providing security. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:17:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287373 The Supreme Court upheld a non-speaking award in favor of a contractor against the Government of Andhra Pradesh, dismissing challenges to its validity. The Court clarified that errors on the face of the record must be distinguished from arbitrators exceeding jurisdiction. The Court held that as the award did not exceed the arbitrator's jurisdiction, challenges based on it being a non-speaking award were dismissed. Additionally, the Court found that the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction in awarding damages for escalation of costs and expenses as no specific amount was awarded for it. The special leave petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioners to withdraw the awarded sum without providing security. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287373