<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21994</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, affirming the applicability of section 64(1)(iii) in cases of property transfers to spouses without adequate consideration. The court held that under section 64(1)(iii), income from such transfers should be included in the individual&#039;s total income, contrary to the assessee&#039;s argument based on section 52(2). The judgment emphasized the limitations of legal fictions and upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, clarifying the assessment of capital gains in such transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21994</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, affirming the applicability of section 64(1)(iii) in cases of property transfers to spouses without adequate consideration. The court held that under section 64(1)(iii), income from such transfers should be included in the individual&#039;s total income, contrary to the assessee&#039;s argument based on section 52(2). The judgment emphasized the limitations of legal fictions and upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, clarifying the assessment of capital gains in such transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>