<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Petitioner Deserves Hearing; Ex-Parte Order Overturned Due to Missed Three-Year Limitation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52895</link>
    <description>Ex-parte order passed by the Special Committee rejecting the application since the application was filed beyond the period of limitation of 3 years - Since the petitioner did not get to participate in the hearing and an ex parte order came to be passed by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner deserves an opportunity of being heard - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:00:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Petitioner Deserves Hearing; Ex-Parte Order Overturned Due to Missed Three-Year Limitation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52895</link>
      <description>Ex-parte order passed by the Special Committee rejecting the application since the application was filed beyond the period of limitation of 3 years - Since the petitioner did not get to participate in the hearing and an ex parte order came to be passed by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner deserves an opportunity of being heard - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:00:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>