<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394420</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals for AY 2008-09, 2011-12, and 2014-15, directing the AO to estimate a 6% profit margin on alleged non-genuine purchases, instead of the 8% initially determined. This decision aligns with judicial precedents, including ITAT rulings in similar cases. The tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on 29/01/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394420</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals for AY 2008-09, 2011-12, and 2014-15, directing the AO to estimate a 6% profit margin on alleged non-genuine purchases, instead of the 8% initially determined. This decision aligns with judicial precedents, including ITAT rulings in similar cases. The tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on 29/01/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>