<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 321 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394414</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation of the land to the District Valuation Officer based on Section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal dismissed grounds related to the legality of assessment and classification of land as urban land. Exemptions under Sections 54F and 54EC were upheld, and the addition of Employee&#039;s Contribution towards PF/ESIC was reversed. The tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on 29.01.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 321 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394414</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation of the land to the District Valuation Officer based on Section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal dismissed grounds related to the legality of assessment and classification of land as urban land. Exemptions under Sections 54F and 54EC were upheld, and the addition of Employee&#039;s Contribution towards PF/ESIC was reversed. The tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on 29.01.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>