<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 318 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394411</link>
    <description>The amended definition of &quot;animal feed&quot;, confining it to kibbled-crushed seeds, pellets or dried cake form, was held arbitrary and beyond the statutory scheme governing import quarantine and plant protection. The record showed no Pest Risk Analysis, no material of infestation from animal feed imports, and no cogent basis to restrict imports otherwise permitted under the foreign trade and customs framework. Existing safeguards such as phytosanitary certification, inspection and fumigation were already available, so the restriction could not be justified on apprehension alone. The amendment was therefore invalid to that extent and quashed, and cotton grain could be cleared as animal feed subject to germination and phytosanitary checks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 318 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394411</link>
      <description>The amended definition of &quot;animal feed&quot;, confining it to kibbled-crushed seeds, pellets or dried cake form, was held arbitrary and beyond the statutory scheme governing import quarantine and plant protection. The record showed no Pest Risk Analysis, no material of infestation from animal feed imports, and no cogent basis to restrict imports otherwise permitted under the foreign trade and customs framework. Existing safeguards such as phytosanitary certification, inspection and fumigation were already available, so the restriction could not be justified on apprehension alone. The amendment was therefore invalid to that extent and quashed, and cotton grain could be cleared as animal feed subject to germination and phytosanitary checks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>